As a fairly avid watch collector, I am often asked about the hierarchy of watch brands and manufacture. There are many names which fall in the luxury Swiss watch category that are not well-known to the general public, let alone easy to pronounce.
Today I am writing this article to make life a little easier for me, as a reference for the next person who asks me where a particular watch brand stands in the gamut of Swiss, German and French tongue-twisters.
Watch brand hierarchy is generally quite established but still very subjective at the same time. Three people will have three different opinions on where Rolex should stand as a luxury watch brand. And out of the three, it is possible that one or all of them may not have heard of a top-ranking manufacture such as Audemars Piguet or Roger Dubuis.
My list of watch brands below will cover most brands in the market, from the entry-level to the crème de la crème of fine Swiss watchmaking. Watch brands by fashion designers such as Gucci, Calvin Klein and Hugo Boss are not listed, and are generally considered as Tier 6, although some of them do carry well-made movements.
Criteria of Assessment
Before I present my version of the top to bottom, it is important that I declare my list of criteria of what constitute the great from the merely good, and the exorbitant from the mildly expensive. While price is quite often a good indication, it is not the only determining factor, as watch brands, in my opinion, are also ranked more favourably based on the following 10 criteria (in order of decreasing importance):
- Heritage, history and provenance
- In-house manufacture status and independence
- Market perception, brand presence, demand and popularity
- Innovation and pioneering spirit
- Creativity in design and function
- Choice of materials and jeweller’s standard of finishing
- Reliability, accuracy and absence of common defects
- Involvement in social activities such as sports and charity events
- Choice of ambassadors and related contribution to society
- Representation at watch shop tier level
You are probably wondering why an important criterion such as “Reliability, accuracy and absence of common defects” would rank so low at number seven in the list above. It doesn’t make sense? Well, when it comes to watches, a lot of things don’t make sense. Spending a million dollars on a timepiece that doesn’t tell the time more accurately than your twenty-dollar quartz-powered digital watch sure doesn’t make sense, any more so than driving a Bentley to get from A to B that a Honda could do reliably and more economically.
When it comes to prestige, good sense goes out the window. So on reliability, accuracy and absence of common defects, most watches worthy of mention here are more or less on the same level, a plus-minus of very small tolerances.
With all else being equal, this criterion would affect very little on a watch brand’s standing, and hence is listed as the seventh important reason to rank a brand. Unless of course, a particular brand’s reliability, accuracy and common defects are way off the charts – then these factors become anomalously more important!
At this point, I would like to point out that while I have tried to be as accurate as possible in my list of hierarchy, it is by no means absolute, and represents only my own perception of the tier value of these watch brands based on my rather “extensive” (read: just a little more than the general public) exposure to Swiss luxury watch brands over the last decade or so, not to mention the countless hours pouring over articles in watch magazines and journals as well as handling watches at all tiers at luxury watch shops.
And don’t be surprised if some of these brands move up or down the tier as the direction of the organisation changes with mergers, take-overs, in-house manufacture status and so on. So here goes:
Tier Levels and Watch Brand Hierarchy
Click on the watch brands highlighted in blue below (where available) to find out more about the company’s watch designs and models, and in some cases, their history.
.
TIER 1 | TOP LUXURY BRANDS WITH HERITAGE AND HISTORY
A. Lange & Sohne, Audemars Piguet, Blancpain, Breguet, Girard-Perregaux, H. Moser & Cie, Jaeger-LeCoultre, Patek Philippe, Ulysse Nardin, Vacheron Constantin, Zenith |
|
TIER 1a | TOP LUXURY BRANDS BY INDEPENDENT MAKERS
Carl F. Bucherer, Christophe Claret, De Bethune, Devon, DeWitt, Dubey & Schaldenbrand, F.P. Journe, Franck Muller, George Daniels, Gerald Genta, Greubel Forsey, Linde Werdelin, MB&F, Parmigiani Fleurier, Philippe Dufour, Pierre Kunz, Richard Mille, Roger Dubuis, Urwerk |
|
TIER 1b | HIGH-END LUXURY BRANDS IN FAVOUR AND DEMAND
Arnold & Son, Bovet 1822, Chronoswiss, Glashütte Original, Hublot, Hysek, HYT, IWC, Jaquet Droz, N.O.A., RGM, Romain Jerome |
TIER 1c | HIGH-END LUXURY BRANDS BY JEWELLERS
Antiquorum, Bulgari, Chanel, Cartier, Chopard, de Grisogono, Harry Winston, Piaget, Tiffany Watch Co., Van Cleef & Arpels, Wempe |
TIER 2 | POPULAR AND FAVOURED LUXURY BRANDS
Breitling, Corum, Cvstos, Graham, Mont Blanc, Omega, Panerai, Perrelet, Ressence, Rolex, Speake-Marin, Tudor |
|
TIER 3 | MID-LEVEL LUXURY BRANDS
Bell & Ross, Bremont, Baume & Mercier, Bedat & Co., Cuervo y Sobrinos, Eberhard & Co., Fortis, Itay Noy, Longines, Maurice Lacroix, Nomos, Paul Picot, Rado, TAG Heuer, Union Glashütte, Tutima |
|
TIER 3a | MID-LEVEL BRANDS
Ball, B.R.M., Edox, Epos, Erhard Junghans, Frédérique Constant, Glycine, Louis Erard, Kobold, Oris, Raymond Weil, Sinn, Wyler |
|
TIER 4 | ABOVE ENTRY-LEVEL BRANDS
Alexander Shorokhoff, Bernhard H. Mayer, Cimier, David Yurman, Ebel, Enicar, Hamilton, Ingersoll, Jorg Gray, Mido, Movado, Officina del Tempo, Revue Thommen, Seiko, Squale, U-Boat, UTS München, Vollmer, Zeno-Watch Basel |
|
TIER 5 | ENTRY-LEVEL BRANDS
Bulova, Casio, Cerruti 1881, Certina, Citizen, Cyma, Festina, Luminox, Orient, Sovil et Titus, Suunto, Swatch, Timex, Tissot, TW Steel, Victorinox, Wenger |
Leave a Comment!
You are welcome to leave comments. If you would like a watch brand not mentioned above to be placed in a tier, kindly state the brand name or manufacture in the comments below. If you think that a certain watch brand above deserves to be in a different tier, do mention it in your comments below as well!
No doubt, there were some valuable opinions, and I have since moved RGM and a few other brands to another tier level. We learn something new everyday, don’t we..
Which tier would a brand like Rotary fit in to?
Very comprehensive already, covered all of the brands I know
how about girard perragaux
GP is right at the top in Tier 1… 😉
Hi Devon Buy, among Longines, Tissot, Seiko, Citizen, Ball, Mido, Hamilton, and Victorinox, which one you would suggest regarding the reliability, longevity, accuracy, and price?
Hi! Great list you got there, I agree with it totally. If you want to make it more complete though, add H.Moser & Cie, Julian Coudray 1518 and Voutilainen 🙂 And if you want to make it even more complete, add R.W.Smith. All these are great watchmakers and deserve to be in the top tiers. Cheers!
What about Louis Moinet what tier you put that brand?
Thoughts on Brera Orologi?
Thanks for writing in, watchguy_115.
Brera Orologi seems to be a new brand and player in the men’s and sports watch market. While they do not have the kind of heritage in watchmaking as the other more established and older brands above, they do employ good materials in some of their watches, like Grade 316 stainless steel in the divers models. Nevertheless, as far as brand presence goes for now, they would be at the entry level tier, based on the criteria for this article.
Thanks Devon! What about Enicar?
Vintage, but interesting nonetheless! I’d put it in Tier 4, based on my recent research. Thank you.
Huge thanks for your rankings.
For a novice like myself, they are invaluable.
Would you happen to have a view on a brand by the name of Jean Richard (formerly Daniel Jean Richard)?
What about Eterna?
U-Boat in Tier 5? Really?? I see the argument that it’s perhaps not Tier 2, but surely not Tier 5!!?? Tier 3 or 3a sounds more realistic and convincing to me.
Dear Devon Buy, I’m afraid I have to agree with Thomas. U-boat doesn’t belong in Tier 5. Why the fuss? Well, your rankings have attracted a sizeable following. This is most deserving because the logic and criteria behind the rankings are very sensible. There is also coherence to the tiers, especially when reference groups are being compared, e.g. ML vs Tag; F Mueller vs CF Bucherer, and so on. Should we really believe that U-boat is on par with Timex, Swatch or Citizen? I fear the credibility of the rankings here are being compromised. Personally, I didn’t see a particular… Read more »
Hi Pat,
Thanks for your input and feedback. Someone also mentioned Tier 3, and I believe that is the most suitable tier for that brand to be in. I like to think of my list as being organic, as it is adjusted accordingly along the way based on market changes, and when important and sensible inputs are put forward by well-informed visitors as yourself.
Thank you once again!
Best regards,
Devon B.
Dear Devon Buy,
Many thanks for your kind consideration, adjusting the ranking of U-boat. Tier 3 is a deserving home for the brand.
I am delighted to learn about (and fully agree with) the organic rankings approach. After all, quality perceptions change over time, so this flexible approach makes a great deal of sense.
Above all, I am impressed by your speedy response to my (and others’) commentary.
Thank you!
Pat
Hi Devon Buy,
How about Swiss Military – Hanowa? Before, they haven’t used “Hanowa” in their name and sold their timepieces under Swiss Military brand, usually the other name thrown in during the Victorinox Swiss Army vs. Wenger Swiss Military era. Sometimes, they get confused with being part of either Victorinox and Wenger but they have been a different company ever since. They can be either Tier 4 or 5.
Also to add in, what do you think of the brand “Henri Sandoz” or “Sandoz”? I think they were one of the many Swiss brands established in the 19th century but didn’t really manage to create a huge following unlike their Swiss counterparts. Similar brands are Cyma and Enicar, not a lot of people are quite familiar with these. Another similar 19th century Swiss brand is Mathey-Tissot, not to be confused with Tissot – totally different companies. I’ve seen them at the mall and all this time they managed to stay relevant in the market, and yes they are expensive… Read more »
Could you add Nomos to the list.
Thanks for the comment and input Ted! I’ve added Nomos under Tier 3 above.
Stowa?
Great article !!
Surprised by Glycine being so high … would have put it in the next tier below
Thanks for the input! Yup, totally agree with you. Done! 👍🏼
Just worth checking also. The Geneva based Foundation Haute Horlogerie Foundation High Horology (FHH)has a a different brand hierarchy see under “The new Fine Watchmaking Perimeter” in the link:
https://www.hautehorlogerie.org/en/the-foundation/cultural-council/white-paper-on-fine-watchmaking/
Hi! Nice list I have to say, congratulations! I am no expert and I have to admit it is always very useful to read some organized pointers. I have a question for you, if you don’t mind: I see you put Seiko in tier 4. Did you put it there considering it as an umbrella brand (that thus includes both Seiko and Grand Seiko watches) or would you distinguish the brands? In which case, where would Grand Seiko end up in your opinion?
Thanks for leaving a comment Marco! I believe Seiko was placed at Tier 4 because of the exact reason that you have mentioned…as an umbrella brand for both Seiko and Grand Seiko. I didn’t really distinguish the brands in the list above, just as I didn’t for TAG Heuer’s ETA and quartz movements in comparison with their in-house movements, although in the case of Seiko and Grand Seiko, the gap between them is much wider and warrants that Grand Seiko be distinguished as a separate brand. If that were the case, I’d probably place Grand Seiko in Tier 3 (or… Read more »
good morning DB, excellent ranking of the hierarchy in brands, I have already studied brands for several years and I agree, only that oris should be in a 3 or 3a for its history and watch machinery, which you think about it. regards
Thanks for dropping by with a comment Jorge! You’re right…I think they should be in Tier 3A, and I’ve made the changes to reflect that.
See that Bremont is in tier 3. Didn’t you have it in tier 1 at some point?
Not sure, I could have. The list above is quite organic and isn’t set in stone, and at some point if someone raised a dispute about a brand’s ranking and I find it to be reasonable or logical, or if I had made a mistake with the placement, the brand moves up or down the tiers.
I’ve understood Bremont to be of the highest quality. Way above average. I would think Tier 3 is too low. At least 2 if not 1.
Wow! That’s great. You have covered almost all the brand. I would also like to suggest you to add Aquacy Watches that provide best quality dive watches at reasonable price.
In due course, once they have reached a level of recognition. Thanks for the suggestion! 😉
Thank you! I have found this a very helpful post in researching which watch I want to buy. I have yet to decide, and I can see how people end up collecting multiple watches. Who knew there was so much to know?…lol
For the most part I agree with your assessment. I do take issue with Victorinox being rated so low. More in line with Tissot and Hamilton than Casio and Citizen. Have a few of the Victorinox and nothing but quality.
Thanks for writing in Gary! Well, the list above doesn’t consider quality as the only criterion in determining where the brands are listed, and as good as the Victorinox watches are in terms of quality, they fall short on the other 7 or 8 criteria of assessment listed in the article. It is listed with Tissot at Tier 5, but you’re right, it could be listed higher than the two you mentioned. Unfortunately, I don’t have a Tier 6, so think of Tier 5 as covering a wider range. I am a huge fan of products by Victorinox, and have… Read more »
I dont see Michael Hill in there?
Hi Stu, thanks for writing in. Micheal Hill is more a fashion brand in my opinion, which I don’t include in the list above. It is for the same reason I don’t include brands like Guess, Daniel Wellington and many others. If I do, the list would be too congested. I may in the future, just not at this moment.
Hi there- I’m curious how you chose to put B&R so high on your list with heritage and in-house movement considerations so high on the criteria!? I’m not complaining as most watch brand rankings put them way too low, but I am definitely curious how you consider them on the Rolex, Omega & Panerai level??? Thank you!
Hi Steve, thanks for chipping in. Yes, I believe you are right. They should be a tier down. I have moved B&R down to Tier 3, which after some consideration, is where they should have been when I created this list years ago. Consider it an error in placement. Thanks for the input!
dB why did Bremont drop from Tier 1 to Tier 3. Curious. Thought they were of the highest quality.
dB, why did Bremont drop from Tier 1 to 3? Curious.
Hi Ted, didn’t realise that Bremont was in Tier 1 earlier, but as good as their quality is, they are definitely not in Tier 1 in my opinion. There are many other criteria in the determination of the ranking, and quality is only one of the 10 or so criteria. They could be a 2, but they are less established or well-known compared to most of the brands I have listed in Tier 2, hence Tier 3 is a more likely tier in my opinion.
Tissot should be a tier above they do have history.
Revue Thommen should be a tier above. They have always been on Oris’ level albeit a bit obscure.
Jacob&Co should be there LOL, on top
You placed Zenith in the same league as PP, CV and AP … are you OK? Is your brain fine?
Yes I did! And while it should have been in a Tier 1d and could have been in a Tier 2a, I didn’t create such tiers, and many factors and criteria place watches where they are in their respective tiers – not just prestige alone – and that’s where Zenith belongs for now.
what about mens Shinola Wataches?
A Zenith in Tier 1??? Zenith is better than a Rolex??? In wich dimensin sir?
Zenith once provided their movements for Rolex, and the tier above is based on 10 factors and not just one. Just because it is more expensive, or everyone wants one, doesn’t put it in a higher tier. Refer: https://www.phillips.com/article/47807511/five-key-dates-the-zenith-el-primero
There is no way you can put Timex in the same category as Tissot and Certina, and Seiko above them either. If you can buy your watch at Walmart (Timex) and Kohls (Seiko), then that watch belongs to the lowest category.
I would move Tissot and Certina to “above entry-level brands”, and bring down Seiko to the last category. Movado belongs to the same category as Vincero in my opinion…